Family Offices Now Lead Demand for Portfolio-Backed Credit, and They Are Borrowing to Acquire
Single-family offices have overtaken fund managers as the largest source of NAV loan demand, and most of that borrowing is funding acquisitions rather than covering distributions.
The largest source of demand for portfolio-backed credit is no longer the private equity fund manager. It is the single-family office, and the shift happened inside a single year.
Mid-2026 origination data from a specialist portfolio-credit lender, drawn from more than 500 enquiries and over 100 screened transactions in the first half of the year, shows single-family offices now account for 65 percent of NAV loan enquiries, up 15 percent year over year. General partners, the traditional core of this market, have fallen to 20 percent. Ultra-high-net-worth individuals make up 10 percent and multi-family offices the remaining 5 percent. Total enquiry volume rose 52 percent against the first half of 2025. A market that was built around funds is now driven by the families that invest in them.
Most of these borrowers are new to the tool. 83 percent of enquiries came from investors that had never previously used fund-level or portfolio-backed leverage. That matters, because it means the demand is not a small group of repeat users cycling facilities. It is a widening base of principals reaching for a structure they had not previously considered, which is usually the sign of a market moving from niche to standard.
The more telling figure is what the borrowing funds. 85 percent of demand is for acquisition financing and funding new investments, not for covering distributions or a cash shortfall. Portfolio owners are not borrowing defensively. They are financing against positions they intend to keep so they can act on opportunities while their capital remains at work. 90 percent of borrowers elected payment-in-kind interest, which preserves portfolio cash flow while the underlying investments mature and exits complete. This is an offensive use of the balance sheet, and it reframes the decision. The question is no longer whether to sell a position. It is whether the portfolio can be made to work harder without being disturbed.
The structure itself is no longer niche. A bond-ratings agency reported that NAV loan issuance reached a record level in 2025, with cumulative rated issuance well past prior years and rating performance holding stable across the book. What was once a specialist facility used by a small group of large funds has become an established part of how sophisticated portfolios are financed. Ratings coverage has expanded alongside issuance, and loan performance has held stable through a period of extended holds, which is part of why more conservative owners are now comfortable using it.
The timing is not an accident. Industry research puts the implied private equity capital cycle at roughly seven years, with distributions coming off a four-year stretch of record lows. When exits are slow and values are holding, a portfolio owner who needs capital faces a choice between selling a stake into a soft secondary market and structuring credit against the position instead. More owners are choosing the second path, and more of them are family offices doing it for the first time.
None of this makes the structure simple. These are underwriting-intensive facilities. The portfolios behind them are often too complex for a bank to value and too small for the largest platforms to prioritize, which is precisely where the need concentrates. Pricing varies widely by collateral, from roughly 400 basis points over reference rates for diversified fund stakes to materially higher for concentrated direct positions. Loan-to-value, covenant structure, and the quality of the valuation anchor determine both whether a facility gets done and what it costs. Approached as a commodity, these facilities tend to be either declined or mispriced.
How Thalos Capital Approaches This
Thalos Capital works these situations entirely on the borrower’s side. When an owner or principal wants to raise capital against a portfolio of fund stakes or direct positions, the mandate is structured individually, around the specific holdings, the valuation anchors, and the timeline of the person who holds them. The work is analytical before it is transactional: establishing what the positions are genuinely worth, sizing a facility that respects that value, and setting terms built for an owner who intends to hold rather than sell. Special Situations mandates run from $5M to $100M+ across the United States and Canada, structured one deal at a time and shaped to the situation rather than forced into a standard form, then carried through to a signed facility. Because the work that determines the outcome is done before the process begins, complex mandates often move faster than their difficulty would suggest.
For an owner approaching this structure for the first time, the difference between a facility that funds an acquisition on schedule and one that stalls is almost entirely in the preparation done before the first conversation with a lender. That is the case for treating a portfolio-backed facility as a structuring decision rather than a simple loan. Most financing situations have more options than the borrower initially sees. A conversation is enough to map them. Start a confidential conversation https://thaloscapital.com/contact.